Thursday, December 7, 2017

Fighting the High Velocity California Wind Fires with Water Misting.

Apparently Dec. 07, 2017 early Thursday morning the Fire Index is going to have the highest number ever recorded. The Fire Index uses a combination of Wind and other factors to calculate the danger level for fires to thrive. A High Fire Index apparently means the danger for the Southern  California Wild Fires to continue and expand is off the charts.

So taking a step back, we have a situation never encountered before, therefore AlexLOGIC would like to suggest a suggestion probably never tried before, fighting the High Fire Index with misted water for the following reasons. 

High winds are probably the most lethal aspect to fighting a fire, think of it as a fire overdosing on oxygen. Since this overnight there will be a combination of high winds and relatively low temperatures of anywhere from the mid 40's to the mid 50's, what if the firefighters could create a water misting firefighting effect that literally weighs down the winds, cools the temperature and increases the moisture content of the cooler, moisture infiltrated winds so the winds slow down their race towards the wildfires?

Is it possible that a very fine water mist could prove the most lethal method of containing and possibly controlling the wildfires?

Is it possible that being able to spray fine misting water high into the sky could be the best way to fight these wind driven fires?

What if the water dropping helicopters simply dropped a perpetual mist and let the wind take it?

AlexLOGIC says its worth the try. Remember, the present combination of extremely high winds and the rash of wildy expanding wildfires has never been this extreme before, so trying something never tried before logically configured might be worth a try, yes?

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

The True Meaning of the Second Amendment, there is something in there for Everybody.

One of the ironies of the second amendment is the attempt from both sides in the gun control battle to only see one meaning. 

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".


So why do both sides of the gun control issue only see their side when a blending of both sides is the obvious remedy? The first portion of the second amendment means a local, state or federal militia that has followed the law, aka well regulated, can carry weapons.

However, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is a separate but equal issue. My interpretation is any property owner can own weapons and these weapons are meant to protect their own property and home.

The second amendment issue that keeps getting blurred and obfuscated is the DIFFERENCE between owning weapons that one keeps on their own property versus weapons that that same gun owner transports off of their own property.

The type of weapons that are permitted to be carried off of one's property are not identical to those that are permitted on one's property, there is a difference, and that is where ALL gun control discussion should be focused upon.

One solution could be to have guns that are Travel approved, and guns that are not Travel Approved. This takes the discussion away from "the government is trying to take my gun away" to, "Which guns can I travel with, and which guns can't I travel with".

If every gun that was not travel worthy had a GPS indicator in it that activated if the gun was moved off of one's property, Law enforcement could instantly be notified. The GPS indicator could not turn off the gun, but it would provide the location of where the non legal travel gun was at all times. If the GPS was messed with, that could mean a stiff fine and even a court date.

Everybody gets what they want. Instant notification when a non approved gun has traveled off of one's property, and the gun owner still gets to own guns for the purpose of protecting their own property, both of the Travel and the Non Travel variety.

As for rapid fire assault weapons, that discussion could follow once a travel / non travel designation has been established for all guns. I personally cannot see it as ethical to legally allow a travel permit for a rapid fire assault weapon off of one's property. I am not even convinced they should be allowed on one's property, but if I had to compromise, then allowing some type of rapid fire gun on one's property, properly registered, would be ok as long as the gun had a GPS that would alert officials if the gun was moved off of the homeowners property.

Although having to wage a conflict against a rapid fire weapon is not even fair for our police officers. The bottom line is, the NRA keeps trying to paint the other side as wanting to "take your gun" when the reality is the other side doesn't want gun owners taking their guns everywhere they go, especially in crowded, public areas.



If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Defusing the North Korea situation by granting North Korea MNNA, Major Non Nato Ally Status.

Wikipedia identifies MNNA. One way to resolve the North Korean situation is to give North Korea MNNA status in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's Nuclear Weapons program.

Why reward a country like North Korea for basically putting their nuclear weapons program above all else? Perhaps because rewarding North Korea for their Nuclear Weapon's program may be the best way to remove North Korea's nuclear weapons.

North Korea has spent decades teaching their people that the rest of the world is basically like their country, and that the United States is the devil that wants to harm North Korea. So if the United States harms North Korea, or their leader Kim Jong Un, then that could make North Korea's depiction of the United States a self fulfilling prophecy.

Removing Kim Jong Un from power, while possibly allowing many North Korean's to breathe a sigh of relief, could allow for the rise of splinter, rogue groups of Kim Jong Un supporters who may continue to detest America and attempt to do America harm.

AlexLOGIC, in this one instance, believes it is best to reward North Korea's behavior if it leads to the dismantling of their Nuclear Weapon's program.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Why are millions who stare at their social media devices suddenly planning to stare at the sun during the Eclipse and go blind?

AlexLOGIC just doesn't get it. 

Whenever AlexLOGIC is out and about he sees the MAJORITY of people staring at their social media devices. So why on earth would these same social media device starers want to take a moment to STARE AT THE SUN during a solar eclipse and risk losing their eyesight?

AlexLOGIC would like to suggest that the millions upon millions of people planning to stare at the sun through sunglasses they have not tested simply find the solar eclipse being streamed live and just watch it on their social media device, assuming that their social media devices while wearing sunglasses won't burn out their eyeballs.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Add Any