Sunday, December 17, 2023

Why prioritizing Animal Welfare, a Coherent Recycling Strategy, and Improved Human Healthcare Services, over Homelessness, could actually help reduce Homelessness.

Imagine a home that hosts one party a day, every day. Most would agree a Party a day, every day, is an unsustainable model for any home to function normally. Now add in that the guests at each Party are different from the previous Parties, the participants do not know each other, did not know the hosts, and have no tangible future plans once that day's Party is over. 

Welcome to America 2023.

https://twitter.com/BenBergquam/status/1736915100760752209 

https://twitter.com/BenBergquam/status/1736915100760752209

This "Party first" approach has run amok in the U.S., courtesy of an unending, escalating stream of Uninvited Migration. It turns out that once a person has attended a "Party" (aka entrance into the United States), their well being at the Party, and after the Party, becomes the responsibility of those who allowed the Party to happen courtesy of our Legal System. 

Enter the Lawyers. Suddenly Lawyers become available to represent the uninvited who attended any of the Parties and were subsequently treated inhumanely.  Lawyers who were not available for the everyday American (many Americans have needed a lawyer at one time or another and not been able to get the help they needed) can now sue the Host of the Party from a wide ranging pallet of potential abuses for those who were never invited to the U.S., nor have ever paid into the U.S. Economy in any way. 

Enter a paradigm shift strategy. 

Because we all know and would all agree that no home can host a party a day in perpetuity without an inevitable harmful outcome due to a lack of ongoing care to the Home's infrastructure and the Home's resident's needs, a shift in strategy is required. 

The Home, the people in the Home, and the Home's contents have to be prioritized FIRST, before more Parties can be had. Welcome to recommitting to our Home, the United States, and those who are already here, and already vulnerable. 

Animals have become one of the most stabilizing influences in at least half of the residences in the United States. Yet more and more animal shelters are becoming Instant Kill shelters when an animal is dropped off by a Guardian who themselves is having a hardship. if we can't be Guardians to the truly most vulnerable, who also give back so much more in love, affection and devotion then, then we should not be having more and more parties.

Our recycling programs are a disaster, surely we would want for America what we expect in our own residences, a relatively tidy place where we can relax and have our moments of peace and tranquility.

Our healthcare is a disaster. Many Hospitals and ER's are either under funded by the Government's medicare and medicaid reimbursement structure, or are under staffed because they are Privately owned and shareholders must be paid a tidy profit at the expense of fair and competent healthcare for all.

If the U.S. cannot competently care take for the animals they love, the land we bury our trash in, and elders and veterans who committed their life to the betterment of the United States, how can we keep allowing millions of the uninvited into our country on a yearly basis?

And therein is the pathway to reduce homelessness. If we presently have less Homeless in the U.S. than the total amount of people who are arriving uninvited ever year, then it would appear reducing the Uninvited to a trickle would allow more resources to be harnessed for the benefit of our Elder and Veteran care, along with Animal and Environmental care, which in turn would significantly reduce homelessness in the U.S.


AlexLOGIC, aka Los Angeles Emmy Winning Producer / Editor Alessandro Machi, is bringing back retro analog video editing gear from the 1990's that will revolutionize video editing for those who do not enjoy or understand editing on a computer. Investors in this retro rebrand concept are welcome. Finished product should gross 10 million in sales annually

Retro at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Friday, March 10, 2023

The 1.2 million voters removed from the Los Angeles County Voter Rolls could impact the George Gascon Recall.

The George Gascon recall drive may have been thwarted by bloated Los Angeles voter rolls that most likely inaccurately raised the recall signature threshold needed to recall George Gascon.

The recent removal of over 1 million, 2 hundred thousand voters from the LA voter Rolls may, or may not, have inflated the number of petition signatures required for the George Gascon recall vote. And, even if the argument is made that that was then, this is now, we would then have to ask how long was the voter roll reduction stalled before it came to be. 

Voter Roll Removal could become a quid pro quo in which LA Officials were stalling before the voters were removed from the voter rolls, thus inflating the number of signatures needed to recall George Gascon. 

Stay tuned as Daily Puma attempts a calculation to see how many less signatures the George Gascon recall actually needed.
 
  
On first glance this would mean the recent removal of 1.2 million voters from the rolls has no standing in regards to the Gascon recall. However, lets backwards engineer the numbers. From a claimed 5.67 million LA voters, the new numbers reflect a drop of 1.2 million voters, meaning there are now 4.47 million voters. This would mean only 447,000 votes would now be needed to recall George Gascon. 
 
Is it fair to just suddenly jettison 1.2 million voters and claim it had no effect on recent recall attempts? DailyPUMA believes the 1.2 million votes that were removed would have to be charted on a graph as if the voter rolls were actually being cleaned up every year. Just because 1.2 million voters were removed from the voter rolls does not mean they all "rolled off" this year. A calculation would have to be made going back at least 10 years and the 1.2 million removed voters could be calculated at 120,000 per year.

2012 to 2020 equals 8 years x 120,000 per year voter attrition. That would mean 960,000 thousand more voters were on the roll in 2020 than actually existed. Instead of 5.67 million voters, the argument can be made that when Gascon was elected, there were only approximately 4.71 million voters. This in turn means the Gascon recall only needed 471,000 votes to qualify, NOT the mandated 567,000.

This also raises the issue that by not updating voter rolls, local Governments are engaging in a power grab in which voters ability to recall an official diminishes the more bloated the voter rolls actually are. This also means vote percentage totals have been significantly inaccurate, which in turn can demoralize voters into thinking their city is apathetic because of inaccurately lower voting percentage totals.
 
If I were involved in the Gascon Recall effort, I would be in court demanding the petition total required to recall Gason was based on voter rolls that were not in compliance with FEDERAL LAWS, and that a new calculation needs to be retroactively applied that would instantly make the Gascon recall valid.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Thursday, March 2, 2023

How much damage did the Medical community inflict by using the term "Nervous Breakdown" to label people as being less than whole?

Why did the term nervous breakdown come to be? Other terms that mean the same thing as Nervous breakdown....Revelation, Acknowledgement, PTSD, Healing, Reviewing, Coping strategy, Grieving, Reaching out, Contemplating, Frustrated, all would have been more life affirming, and, MORE ACCURATE, than putting the "nervous breakdown" label on someone.
 

I wonder how many people suffered real trauma by being medically labeled as experiencing a nervous breakdown.

 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Add Any