Supreme Court 2022 Abortion Ruling falls short.

If I could ask the Supreme Court Justices one question regarding their Abortion ruling, it would be how did they become so focused on Federal versus State rights rulings to the point they never considered ruling that would have encourage every State to consider allowing Individual counties within each State to decide if Abortion should be legal, or not, with each County?

If a reader reacts in a knee jerk fashion to the above concept, than perhaps the reader has become so brainwashed and accustomed to Federal vs States rights they have missed the trees within the forest.

If the popular vote for or against Abortion is within a narrow plurality of a few percentage points in either direction, then no matter how the State rules, they are using a minimal majority to force a stark philosophy on the rest of the State's population.

However, if each and every county could decide if they preferred to legalize or not legalize Abortion, then each State would have the ideal scenario. Certain parts of the State would be against Abortion, and other parts would be for Abortion, and that would most closely represent the will of the people.

Unlike the highly politicized demand that the popular vote be used to determine Presidential elections, using the popular vote of individual counties to decide Abortion policy within each county would give residents of every State reasonable options to both flex and enforce their beliefs about Abortion pro or con, while not imposing their will on others.

 

 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting

When People get upset over historical events, it is IMPERATIVE they do this one thing.

When reviewing Historical events, it is imperative to balance our emotional reaction of the past with the appropriate amount of humility.

If events had occurred differently before we ourselves were conceived, it is quite possible a different human spirit would exist in place of our own, we would therefore no longer have ever existed.

I find that 99% or more of all people who are enraged about historical events that occurred before they themselves were conceived refuse to humble themselves by realizing that they themselves would have never existed if the past had been different before they were conceived.

I can be upset that Adolph Hitler existed and rose to power by inflaming pre-adults into believing they were a superior race, but if Hitler had never existed, neither would anyone who was born after Hitler became relevant and powerful in Germany.

If you could chose whether or not Adolph Hitler ever existed, but  you would suddenly have never existed as a direct result of this choice, would you still chose for Hitler to have never have existed?

We can never own the past without having lived in it, this is a reality that many refuse to acknowledge and to be humbled by.

 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting

Mainstrean Media released deceptively edited 911 footage of the Pentagon Airplane crash that fueled conspiracy theorists ever since.

I don't know if it was intentional, or just some intern carelessly prepping the Pentagon video clip that would be released by The AP, but the video footage that was released was shortened in such a way as to create just enough doubt that it was an airplane that hit the Pentagon.

I recently came across the part of the footage that was missing, and I debunked it as being a missile, and now I can't find that video link online. Now THAT'S a conspiracy.

Here is what The Associated Press released on YouTube.

The above footage cuts off critical moments before the explosion that easily and coherently allows me to explain why this is was an airplane that hit the Pentagon.

I did find another video of this same angle on Pinterest, except the video appears to have been zoomed in, once again leaving me to wonder if the real conspiracy was making the video look it could be a missile when it was not. Click here to see the zoomed in perspective, which also may add enough doubt to satiate most Conspiracy Theorists.

I managed to find the version of the Pentagon 911 plane crash video that claims it was a missile. What is actually so crazy is this is the only video on Youtube that I could find that actually provides the evidence other two videos did not provide that allowed me to debunk the claim that this was a missile.

This is a conspiracy within a conspiracy that actually reveals the truth. I will add why this video explains this is a plane crash and not a missile crash in the future. And my evidence goes well beyond the one frame just before the explosion that shows a white blurry object in the far right part of the video image.

Check back and I will provide the explanation.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting

Medicare Discharge Appeal Criteria KILLS Seniors and Protects ER EMTALA VIOLATORS.

I am fuming right now. According to Medicare Discharge Appeal Criteria, an ER Patient cannot appeal being discharged from the ER if they have not yet been admitted to a Hospital Room!

This is pure insanity!

Congress passed a law called EMTALA to specifically ensure that any Hospital patient not be discharged if their condition is not stable. Is Medicare now stating that the ER is not a Hospital and therefore Patients who are not stable can be legally dumped as long as the ER does not document the decline in the Patient's health and just discharges the patient instead?

Is Medicare following a policy that literally spits on the very purpose that EMTALA was created?  YES!

Quoting from a site that allegedly advocates for patients who have been wrongfully discharged from the Hospital...

"To appeal your discharge, you must be an inpatient. There is no official way to appeal your release if you are in observation or outpatient status. You can ask your doctor to tell you your status. At your admission and again before discharge, the hospital staff must give you a form called "An Important Message from Medicare." This form includes the phone number for the QIO and tells you what you need to do to appeal the discharge. If the hospital staff did not give you this form, ask for it. By law, the hospital must provide you with this information."  end quote.

The above quote just spit on the very concept of EMTALA and the illegality of Patient Dumping!  This is insanity. I have found this over and over and over when it comes to finding advocates for Healthcare patients, Patient Advocates are VERY SUBMISSIVE and will ALWAYS SIDE with what they are told by the very people who are AGAINST Patients Rights.

Repeating the specific sentence from the above quote. "There is no official way to appeal your release if you are in observation or outpatient status." end quote. 

How can anyone who knows what EMTALA actually means utter such completely incorrect advice? And if the advice is correct, then what a corrupt system we have in place for protecting those who have violated the EMTALA rights of their patients.

Medicare or the people who created the page I am quoting from are apparently saying that the ER can violate a patient's EMTALA rights if the patient has not officially been admitted to a hospital room! How can Medicare sanction illegality and deny appeals that are based on illegal ER actions?

So when Hospital patients are piled up in the hallways of ER rooms waiting to get a room, in theory they could be discharged and the patient would have no right to appeal the discharge decision. This is beyond outrageous. And this situation will only get worse as the present Administration allows 2 million Undocumented to enter the U.S. every year.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting

Playing the "What if" Game regarding the 2022 Oscar Awards and the Slap heard Round the World.

After the Chris Rock "G.I. Jane" joke, what if Jada Pinkett Smith had started to cry, gotten up, and asked Will Smith to escort her out of the Academy Awards Show, and slowly, while softly sobbing, left the Academy Awards Show with Will Smith by her side, and that long, flowing green dress lingering behind them?

What would have happened?

Would not both Jada and Will have been the toast of the World? Would not the Academy, and possibly Chris Rock, actually pursued both Will and Jada and begged them to come back to the show?

Instead we got the Slap heard round the World.

I mention this because Black Anger sometimes wins out over Black Vulnerability, perhaps because African Americans don't believe others would have empathy for them when they feel they have been dissed?

Perhaps owning one's own vulnerability is the secret to success?

Which is why I LOVE this Crest commercial so much. The final shot of this commercial is so memorable, awe inspiring, and full of so much positivity I hope people of all colors embrace the message, and ironically the final shot was about as long as the slap heard round the world.

I think this kid Amarr Wooten ... Lead role, has a future in Hollywood, bigly. And props to the co-stars Camryn Hamm ... Girl in driver's seat of car, Kimberly Hamm ... Girl in car with phone who both came off as totally believable and likeable.

The commercial is well shot, directed and performed. Would have loved to have seen a wider shot approaching the car but they packed a lot into a 15 second spot.

Owning a moment in time with authenticity apparently surpasses lashing out in anger.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting

COVID-19 Protocols the Media Never Questioned Raises more Questions.

What COVID-19 related Big Tech Censorship revealed was there was only one way forward, "Do as the alleged Medical Experts say to do and do not disagree with their message in any way".

We are a civilization of experimenters. A significant number of both Doctors and Patients quickly chilled to the idea that that there was only one combination to combat COVID-19: Social Distancing, Masking, Vaccines, and Home Quarantine.

Questions that were not allowed to be discussed by people with questions included... 

• Was it possible that breathing in and out of a mask all day long might have unknown, detrimental consequences? 
• Was it possible that after 20 years of never coming up with an overall effective flu vaccine, Big Pharma would come up with an effective Vaccine for COVID-19 in less than one year's time?
• Was it ethical to project the theory that a Vaccine was human kind's only hope against COVID-19 as a fact?
• Why do many who protest what they see as COVID-19 tyranny  believe that sneezing does not spread COVID-19?
• In the very early stages of a possible COVID-19 infection, when a person was asked to Home Quarantine for 7 to 14 days, why were there no Home Quarantine Studies being done to see if a certain combination of activities might actually slow down the  growth of a COVID-19 infection? Thus allowing a person's anti-bodies to do a better job of preventing COVID-19 from progressing into a life threatening situation.
• Why was Donald Trump so mercilessly attacked when he asked a question about COVID-19 treatment ideas that was meant to elicit a discussion about possible COVID-19 treatment options above and beyond Vaccine and Masks since the Vaccine was still over 6 months away from being available?
• How were people supposed to react to accusations of Medical Racism in Underserved Communities after decades of Undocumented Migration producing concentrated pockets of Under Served living in big cities and in cramped, over crowded quarters, who may have actually been driving up COVID-19 numbers and inevitable fears and Government controls and thus causing others who lived in less cramped conditions to be just as restricted in their daily activities when they were not the cause of the inflated COVID-19 Numbers?
• Why were obese people upset that not everyone else wanted to completely comply with insufferable COVID-19 restrictions because of the obese person's obesity?
• Why were Family members blockaded from any type of visitation with COVID-19 Hospital Patients, never getting to see them before they passed?
• Why were COVID-19 Hospital Patients kept imprisoned to the point where one wonders if lack of movement contributed to their demise?
• Was it possible that placing numerous COVID-19 Hospital Patients in the same large room actually contributed to their death? 

The present but temporary 2022 respite from COVID-19 restrictions has made Anti-Big Tech dig in their heels and say "Never Again" when nothing has actually changed other than a COVID-19 respite for the time being.

It seems as if what COVID-19 ultimately created was a method for Government to control entire populations who were never asked to participate in any type of voluntary, home based clinical trial experiments during Home Quarantine to see if there were any ways to reduce the overall personal impact of COVID-19, and that stunning oversight continues to this day, in large part because both Big Tech and our Mainstream media seemed to like it that way.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com

You can also view more

commercial critiques

by Alessandro Machi at

Super Bowl Consulting