Sunday, December 17, 2023

Why prioritizing Animal Welfare, a Coherent Recycling Strategy, and Improved Human Healthcare Services, over Homelessness, could actually help reduce Homelessness.

Imagine a home that hosts one party a day, every day. Most would agree a Party a day, every day, is an unsustainable model for any home to function normally. Now add in that the guests at each Party are different from the previous Parties, the participants do not know each other, did not know the hosts, and have no tangible future plans once that day's Party is over. 

Welcome to America 2023.

https://twitter.com/BenBergquam/status/1736915100760752209 

https://twitter.com/BenBergquam/status/1736915100760752209

This "Party first" approach has run amok in the U.S., courtesy of an unending, escalating stream of Uninvited Migration. It turns out that once a person has attended a "Party" (aka entrance into the United States), their well being at the Party, and after the Party, becomes the responsibility of those who allowed the Party to happen courtesy of our Legal System. 

Enter the Lawyers. Suddenly Lawyers become available to represent the uninvited who attended any of the Parties and were subsequently treated inhumanely.  Lawyers who were not available for the everyday American (many Americans have needed a lawyer at one time or another and not been able to get the help they needed) can now sue the Host of the Party from a wide ranging pallet of potential abuses for those who were never invited to the U.S., nor have ever paid into the U.S. Economy in any way. 

Enter a paradigm shift strategy. 

Because we all know and would all agree that no home can host a party a day in perpetuity without an inevitable harmful outcome due to a lack of ongoing care to the Home's infrastructure and the Home's resident's needs, a shift in strategy is required. 

The Home, the people in the Home, and the Home's contents have to be prioritized FIRST, before more Parties can be had. Welcome to recommitting to our Home, the United States, and those who are already here, and already vulnerable. 

Animals have become one of the most stabilizing influences in at least half of the residences in the United States. Yet more and more animal shelters are becoming Instant Kill shelters when an animal is dropped off by a Guardian who themselves is having a hardship. if we can't be Guardians to the truly most vulnerable, who also give back so much more in love, affection and devotion then, then we should not be having more and more parties.

Our recycling programs are a disaster, surely we would want for America what we expect in our own residences, a relatively tidy place where we can relax and have our moments of peace and tranquility.

Our healthcare is a disaster. Many Hospitals and ER's are either under funded by the Government's medicare and medicaid reimbursement structure, or are under staffed because they are Privately owned and shareholders must be paid a tidy profit at the expense of fair and competent healthcare for all.

If the U.S. cannot competently care take for the animals they love, the land we bury our trash in, and elders and veterans who committed their life to the betterment of the United States, how can we keep allowing millions of the uninvited into our country on a yearly basis?

And therein is the pathway to reduce homelessness. If we presently have less Homeless in the U.S. than the total amount of people who are arriving uninvited ever year, then it would appear reducing the Uninvited to a trickle would allow more resources to be harnessed for the benefit of our Elder and Veteran care, along with Animal and Environmental care, which in turn would significantly reduce homelessness in the U.S.


AlexLOGIC, aka Los Angeles Emmy Winning Producer / Editor Alessandro Machi, is bringing back retro analog video editing gear from the 1990's that will revolutionize video editing for those who do not enjoy or understand editing on a computer. Investors in this retro rebrand concept are welcome. Finished product should gross 10 million in sales annually

Retro at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Friday, March 10, 2023

The 1.2 million voters removed from the Los Angeles County Voter Rolls could impact the George Gascon Recall.

The George Gascon recall drive may have been thwarted by bloated Los Angeles voter rolls that most likely inaccurately raised the recall signature threshold needed to recall George Gascon.

The recent removal of over 1 million, 2 hundred thousand voters from the LA voter Rolls may, or may not, have inflated the number of petition signatures required for the George Gascon recall vote. And, even if the argument is made that that was then, this is now, we would then have to ask how long was the voter roll reduction stalled before it came to be. 

Voter Roll Removal could become a quid pro quo in which LA Officials were stalling before the voters were removed from the voter rolls, thus inflating the number of signatures needed to recall George Gascon. 

Stay tuned as Daily Puma attempts a calculation to see how many less signatures the George Gascon recall actually needed.
 
  
On first glance this would mean the recent removal of 1.2 million voters from the rolls has no standing in regards to the Gascon recall. However, lets backwards engineer the numbers. From a claimed 5.67 million LA voters, the new numbers reflect a drop of 1.2 million voters, meaning there are now 4.47 million voters. This would mean only 447,000 votes would now be needed to recall George Gascon. 
 
Is it fair to just suddenly jettison 1.2 million voters and claim it had no effect on recent recall attempts? DailyPUMA believes the 1.2 million votes that were removed would have to be charted on a graph as if the voter rolls were actually being cleaned up every year. Just because 1.2 million voters were removed from the voter rolls does not mean they all "rolled off" this year. A calculation would have to be made going back at least 10 years and the 1.2 million removed voters could be calculated at 120,000 per year.

2012 to 2020 equals 8 years x 120,000 per year voter attrition. That would mean 960,000 thousand more voters were on the roll in 2020 than actually existed. Instead of 5.67 million voters, the argument can be made that when Gascon was elected, there were only approximately 4.71 million voters. This in turn means the Gascon recall only needed 471,000 votes to qualify, NOT the mandated 567,000.

This also raises the issue that by not updating voter rolls, local Governments are engaging in a power grab in which voters ability to recall an official diminishes the more bloated the voter rolls actually are. This also means vote percentage totals have been significantly inaccurate, which in turn can demoralize voters into thinking their city is apathetic because of inaccurately lower voting percentage totals.
 
If I were involved in the Gascon Recall effort, I would be in court demanding the petition total required to recall Gason was based on voter rolls that were not in compliance with FEDERAL LAWS, and that a new calculation needs to be retroactively applied that would instantly make the Gascon recall valid.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Thursday, March 2, 2023

How much damage did the Medical community inflict by using the term "Nervous Breakdown" to label people as being less than whole?

Why did the term nervous breakdown come to be? Other terms that mean the same thing as Nervous breakdown....Revelation, Acknowledgement, PTSD, Healing, Reviewing, Coping strategy, Grieving, Reaching out, Contemplating, Frustrated, all would have been more life affirming, and, MORE ACCURATE, than putting the "nervous breakdown" label on someone.
 

I wonder how many people suffered real trauma by being medically labeled as experiencing a nervous breakdown.

 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Thursday, August 25, 2022

Supreme Court 2022 Abortion Ruling falls short.

If I could ask the Supreme Court Justices one question regarding their Abortion ruling, it would be how did they become so focused on Federal versus State rights rulings to the point they never considered ruling that would have encourage every State to consider allowing Individual counties within each State to decide if Abortion should be legal, or not, with each County?

If a reader reacts in a knee jerk fashion to the above concept, than perhaps the reader has become so brainwashed and accustomed to Federal vs States rights they have missed the trees within the forest.

If the popular vote for or against Abortion is within a narrow plurality of a few percentage points in either direction, then no matter how the State rules, they are using a minimal majority to force a stark philosophy on the rest of the State's population.

However, if each and every county could decide if they preferred to legalize or not legalize Abortion, then each State would have the ideal scenario. Certain parts of the State would be against Abortion, and other parts would be for Abortion, and that would most closely represent the will of the people.

Unlike the highly politicized demand that the popular vote be used to determine Presidential elections, using the popular vote of individual counties to decide Abortion policy within each county would give residents of every State reasonable options to both flex and enforce their beliefs about Abortion pro or con, while not imposing their will on others.

 

 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Monday, June 27, 2022

When People get upset over historical events, it is IMPERATIVE they do this one thing.

When reviewing Historical events, it is imperative to balance our emotional reaction of the past with the appropriate amount of humility.

If events had occurred differently before we ourselves were conceived, it is quite possible a different human spirit would exist in place of our own, we would therefore no longer have ever existed.

I find that 99% or more of all people who are enraged about historical events that occurred before they themselves were conceived refuse to humble themselves by realizing that they themselves would have never existed if the past had been different before they were conceived.

I can be upset that Adolph Hitler existed and rose to power by inflaming pre-adults into believing they were a superior race, but if Hitler had never existed, neither would anyone who was born after Hitler became relevant and powerful in Germany.

If you could chose whether or not Adolph Hitler ever existed, but  you would suddenly have never existed as a direct result of this choice, would you still chose for Hitler to have never have existed?

We can never own the past without having lived in it, this is a reality that many refuse to acknowledge and to be humbled by.


 

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...

info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Sunday, April 10, 2022

Mainstrean Media released deceptively edited 911 footage of the Pentagon Airplane crash that fueled conspiracy theorists ever since.

I don't know if it was intentional, or just some intern carelessly prepping the Pentagon video clip that would be released by The AP, but the video footage that was released was shortened in such a way as to create just enough doubt that it was an airplane that hit the Pentagon.

I recently came across the part of the footage that was missing, and I debunked it as being a missile, and now I can't find that video link online. Now THAT'S a conspiracy.

Here is what The Associated Press released on YouTube.

The above footage cuts off critical moments before the explosion that easily and coherently allows me to explain why this is was an airplane that hit the Pentagon.

I did find another video of this same angle on Pinterest, except the video appears to have been zoomed in, once again leaving me to wonder if the real conspiracy was making the video look it could be a missile when it was not. Click here to see the zoomed in perspective, which also may add enough doubt to satiate most Conspiracy Theorists.

I managed to find the version of the Pentagon 911 plane crash video that claims it was a missile. What is actually so crazy is this is the only video on Youtube that I could find that actually provides the evidence other two videos did not provide that allowed me to debunk the claim that this was a missile.


This is a conspiracy within a conspiracy that actually reveals the truth. I will add why this video explains this is a plane crash and not a missile crash in the future. And my evidence goes well beyond the one frame just before the explosion that shows a white blurry object in the far right part of the video image.

Check back and I will provide the explanation.



If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Medicare Discharge Appeal Criteria KILLS Seniors and Protects ER EMTALA VIOLATORS.

I am fuming right now. According to Medicare Discharge Appeal Criteria, an ER Patient cannot appeal being discharged from the ER if they have not yet been admitted to a Hospital Room!

This is pure insanity!

Congress passed a law called EMTALA to specifically ensure that any Hospital patient not be discharged if their condition is not stable. Is Medicare now stating that the ER is not a Hospital and therefore Patients who are not stable can be legally dumped as long as the ER does not document the decline in the Patient's health and just discharges the patient instead?

Is Medicare following a policy that literally spits on the very purpose that EMTALA was created?  YES!


"To appeal your discharge, you must be an inpatient. There is no official way to appeal your release if you are in observation or outpatient status. You can ask your doctor to tell you your status. At your admission and again before discharge, the hospital staff must give you a form called "An Important Message from Medicare." This form includes the phone number for the QIO and tells you what you need to do to appeal the discharge. If the hospital staff did not give you this form, ask for it. By law, the hospital must provide you with this information."  end quote.

The above quote just spit on the very concept of EMTALA and the illegality of Patient Dumping!  This is insanity. I have found this over and over and over when it comes to finding advocates for Healthcare patients, Patient Advocates are VERY SUBMISSIVE and will ALWAYS SIDE with what they are told by the very people who are AGAINST Patients Rights.

Repeating the specific sentence from the above quote. "There is no official way to appeal your release if you are in observation or outpatient status." end quote. 

How can anyone who knows what EMTALA actually means utter such completely incorrect advice? And if the advice is correct, then what a corrupt system we have in place for protecting those who have violated the EMTALA rights of their patients.

Medicare or the people who created the page I am quoting from are apparently saying that the ER can violate a patient's EMTALA rights if the patient has not officially been admitted to a hospital room! How can Medicare sanction illegality and deny appeals that are based on illegal ER actions?

So when Hospital patients are piled up in the hallways of ER rooms waiting to get a room, in theory they could be discharged and the patient would have no right to appeal the discharge decision. This is beyond outrageous. And this situation will only get worse as the present Administration allows 2 million Undocumented to enter the U.S. every year.





If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Sunday, April 3, 2022

Playing the "What if" Game regarding the 2022 Oscar Awards and the Slap heard Round the World.

After the Chris Rock "G.I. Jane" joke, what if Jada Pinkett Smith had started to cry, gotten up, and asked Will Smith to escort her out of the Academy Awards Show, and slowly, while softly sobbing, left the Academy Awards Show with Will Smith by her side, and that long, flowing green dress lingering behind them?

What would have happened?

Would not both Jada and Will have been the toast of the World? Would not the Academy, and possibly Chris Rock, actually pursued both Will and Jada and begged them to come back to the show?

Instead we got the Slap heard round the World.

I mention this because Black Anger sometimes wins out over Black Vulnerability, perhaps because African Americans don't believe others would have empathy for them when they feel they have been dissed?

Perhaps owning one's own vulnerability is the secret to success?

Which is why I LOVE this Crest commercial so much. The final shot of this commercial is so memorable, awe inspiring, and full of so much positivity I hope people of all colors embrace the message, and ironically the final shot was about as long as the slap heard round the world.
I think this kid Amarr Wooten ... Lead role, has a future in Hollywood, bigly. And props to the co-stars Camryn Hamm ... Girl in driver's seat of car, Kimberly Hamm ... Girl in car with phone who both came off as totally believable and likeable.

The commercial is well shot, directed and performed. Would have loved to have seen a wider shot approaching the car but they packed a lot into a 15 second spot.

Owning a moment in time with authenticity apparently surpasses lashing out in anger.



If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Sunday, March 27, 2022

COVID-19 Protocols the Media Never Questioned Raises more Questions.

What COVID-19 related Big Tech Censorship revealed was there was only one way forward, "Do as the alleged Medical Experts say to do and do not disagree with their message in any way".
We are a civilization of experimenters. A significant number of both Doctors and Patients quickly chilled to the idea that that there was only one combination to combat COVID-19: Social Distancing, Masking, Vaccines, and Home Quarantine.

Questions that were not allowed to be discussed by people with questions included... 
  • Was it possible that breathing in and out of a mask all day long might have unknown, detrimental consequences? 
  • Was it possible that after 20 years of never coming up with an overall effective flu vaccine, Big Pharma would come up with an effective Vaccine for COVID-19 in less than one year's time?
  • Was it ethical to project the theory that a Vaccine was human kind's only hope against COVID-19 as a fact?
  • Why do many who protest what they see as COVID-19 tyranny  believe that sneezing does not spread COVID-19?
  • In the very early stages of a possible COVID-19 infection, when a person was asked to Home Quarantine for 7 to 14 days, why were there no Home Quarantine Studies being done to see if a certain combination of activities might actually slow down the  growth of a COVID-19 infection? Thus allowing a person's anti-bodies to do a better job of preventing COVID-19 from progressing into a life threatening situation.
  • Why was Donald Trump so mercilessly attacked when he asked a question about COVID-19 treatment ideas that was meant to elicit a discussion about possible COVID-19 treatment options above and beyond Vaccine and Masks since the Vaccine was still over 6 months away from being available?
  • How were people supposed to react to accusations of Medical Racism in Underserved Communities after decades of Undocumented Migration producing concentrated pockets of Under Served living in big cities and in cramped, over crowded quarters, who may have actually been driving up COVID-19 numbers and inevitable fears and Government controls and thus causing others who lived in less cramped conditions to be just as restricted in their daily activities when they were not the cause of the inflated COVID-19 Numbers?
  • Why were obese people upset that not everyone else wanted to completely comply with insufferable COVID-19 restrictions because of the obese person's obesity?
  • Why were Family members blockaded from any type of visitation with COVID-19 Hospital Patients, never getting to see them before they passed?
  • Why were COVID-19 Hospital Patients kept imprisoned to the point where one wonders if lack of movement contributed to their demise?
  • Was it possible that placing numerous COVID-19 Hospital Patients in the same large room actually contributed to their death? 
The present but temporary 2022 respite from COVID-19 restrictions has made Anti-Big Tech dig in their heels and say "Never Again" when nothing has actually changed other than a COVID-19 respite for the time being.

It seems as if what COVID-19 ultimately created was a method for Government to control entire populations who were never asked to participate in any type of voluntary, home based clinical trial experiments during Home Quarantine to see if there were any ways to reduce the overall personal impact of COVID-19, and that stunning oversight continues to this day, in large part because both Big Tech and our Mainstream media seemed to like it that way.



If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Monday, October 18, 2021

An Internet Innovation that could create product royalties for a viewer's favorite websites.

This is so darn logical in regards to Internet ads I cannot understand why it is not being done. All I want on my favorite websites that I want to support is a text box where I can type in what I am looking for and if I know the site where the product resides, I can type that in as well.
After I hit click the I am transported to either the site where I intend on purchasing a product, or to a page with a few choices. If I Purchase something the site I was on gets a percentage residual. What a great way to support your local online newspaper or blogger. 

Rather than show me an ad of a product that I looked at a week ago and may have already purchased or am no longer interested in, why not just put an empty text box on the site I am on and I type in what I am looking for?

What am I missing? 
Why doesn't the above already exist?





If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Friday, December 11, 2020

Debunking Barbara Kay's Queen Gambit's review about a woman never becoming World Chess Champion.

Barbara Kay's opine about the Pay TV hit show "The Queen's Gambit" attempts to highlight what the show won't, that no woman has actually won a World Championship in Chess, ever.

Kay tries to justify the premise that a woman may never win a chess championship by pointing out that the male's steadfast desire to win a chess match even while Rome burns in the background and soon the male chess player will be decapitated, yet continues to play on nonetheless, as reason enough to accept that a woman will never win a chess championship because women know when to fold and know when to run, whereas men don't.

However, the foundational reasons she refers to about the history of chess skips over the real reason we have not had a woman world chess champion, and it can be summed up in one word, incentive.

In my opinion it would be ridiculous to make an assumption about any person, place or thing as never being equivalent to another person place or thing if one of the two being compared has never received similar nurturing or support, aka incentive.

If whatever chess championships and prize monies had been equivalently applied to both genders year after year, I believe eventually a female chess champion would have arisen who could have then beaten the male chess champion for the honor World Champion.

Ironically, it would be that same bullheaded, unrelenting male attribute, applied by a male as a coach to prospective female chess players that might become the difference maker.

Visualize it is 1970 and the Female World Chess Champion has a Chess rating of 2100, while the Male Chess Champion has a rating of 2800, yet both players received equal pay outs as they won match after match.

Isn't it logical to assume that great male chess players who themselves all fell short in their attempts to be the Male Chess Champion would not want to get into coaching to bring the World Female Chess Champion Rating above the 2100 where it stands?

I can envision scores of Male Chess Players wanting to be the first to coach a female Chess Player to greatness and attain the allegedly unattainable, the World's best Chess player from either gender.

And while we're at it, if women designed the Chess pieces, that alone might neutralize any alleged advantage men have in the arena of Chess.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Saturday, March 21, 2020

CDC 2017-2018 U.S Senior Flu Epidemic cover-up has come back to haunt the World in 2020.

In Italy they are having to decide who gets treated for Coronavirus and who gets turned away. In the U.S. this practice is called EMTALA and is supposed to be illegal. 


If the illegal practice of turning away patients had been exposed during the U.S. Senior Flu epidemic of 2017-2018, this country would have had a huge head start over Coronavirus readiness in 2020 and would have also given the world a heads up about Pandemic readiness. 

Instead the Center for Disease Control covered up the 2017-2018 Senior Death counts until after the 2017-2018 U.S. Senior Flu epidemic had passed.

If my reminders about my Mother's elder abuse / EMTALA violation in the ER in March of 2018 had been taken seriously and actually investigated they would have raised awareness about how fragile our ER readiness was and would have reduced the level of economic upheaval in 2020 being caused by not having enough Hospital beds and ventilators available. And let's not forget not enough masks, gloves, and hospital gowns.

The flatten the curve battle plan is caused in large part by not being health crisis ready because we have too few beds and far too few ventilators.  

How we treat the elderly is where we find our real level of integrity and strength. The CDC covering up our mistreatment of the elderly during the "2017-2018 U.S. Senior Flu epidemic" that was never reported as such... is now being paid forward. 

We are reaping what we sowed back in 2017-2018.




If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Friday, July 12, 2019

Good Buy Kodachrome, A Super 8mm Film Tribute to Kodak's Kodachrome 40.

This was a Tribute Video I edited from many of the places I visited in Southern California and shot Super-8mm Film. It was a tribute to the end of Kodak's Kodachrome 40. Unlike the ending, I now find that Kodak Ecktachrome and Kodak's Super 8mm Negative Film Stocks are quite good.  Film Origination, Digital Destination.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

How False News Picture Captions Dumb Down Society.



If you read the description of the above photo, the presumably Unarmed, Undisguised Female Protestor apparently is not being physically assaulted and brutalized by an armor encased Law Enforcement Person, she instead being "Detained".

When words are used to camouflage the real impact of a Photo, we either challenge it, or grow dumber by accepting the false caption.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Sunday, May 12, 2019

When Mom takes a Break from Her walk with her Son so he can Take a Picture of her. Happy Mother's day to all Moms.

Fortunata Machi, Mother of Alessandro Machi.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Monday, April 15, 2019

Begging all the Online News Media Outlets that don't Accept or Allow Reader Comments, PLEASE don't use Rhetorical Questions in your Headlines.

I Can't believe this is a thing. Online New sites allow their authors to use rhetorical questions in their headlines, yet the readers of the article have no way to leave a comment.

This is really a big deal. It's a freaky form of mind control where one is invited to a buffet where there are no utensils or plates.

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

Republicans biggest Objection to the Affordable HealthCare ACT is this...

There is ONE core issue that will ALWAYS be present no matter which Political party comes up with an Affordable National Healthcare Insurance Plan; Does the plan offer a "Catastrophic Coverage Only" option? 
Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage allows an Enrollee to get a very high Hospital deductible of around 5,000 dollars and in exchange get a significantly lower monthly Health Insurance Premium. 

If a person buys Catastrophic HealthCare Coverage they can "break even" within 2 to 3 years. Break even means if a Catastrophic Healthcare Policy Holder has just one Medical incident that requires Hospitalization and a 5,000 dollar deductible payment, the policy holder STILL starts saving a lot money on monthly premium costs after 2 and 1/2 years from the time they started buying the heavily discounted Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage, versus purchasing more standardized Healthcare Insurance that covers Doctor's visits, Lab procedures, prescriptions, and ER visits.

So what's the problem?

Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage means Hospitalization only coverage, so the Enrollee is not seen regularly by a Doctor nor do they get blood tests. Opponents claim Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage Policy Holders are being selfish because by not being regularly seen by a Doctor or having any tests done, the CHC Policy Holder simply waits until a minor problem becomes big enough to require Hospitalization, and by then the Hospital Deductible has been saved and then some through lower monthly CHC premiums. So the opponents of CHC claim that CHC Enrollees are relying on others who pay for full coverage to cover their Hospital Medical Costs that may have been caused by waiting too long to be seen by a Medical Professional.

The anti CHC argues that people who are healthier still need to pay their fair share now so they too can enjoy great coverage as they get older. The anti CHC followers believe that if the Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage enrollee had seen a doctor regularly, they might have avoided the much bigger Hospitalization expense that came as a result of not being seen regularly by a Doctor.

That in a nutshell is the perpetual Democrat vs Republican argument in regard to Healthcare. Democrats don't want Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage options, Republicans do. Both sides go round and round making the other side look bad.

Of course Republicans and probably a majority of Americans do not like the idea of paying a penalty if they have no Medical Insurance, and Democrats do not want to see relatively healthy people game the HealthCare Insurance system by purchasing Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage only Health Insurance policies because it creates a smaller overall pool of money for the entire Healthcare Insurance System.

Catastrophic Healthcare Coverage is the single most compelling issue in regards to the entire Affordable Healthcare Act issue. Be aware that both sides feel they are right and compromise does not seem likely or possible.

Perhaps the outside the box solution is to be a more self reliant nation that does not need to be so heavily involved in the World's affairs, this would reduce military budgeting and possibly allow the U.S. to start reducing their budget deficit. This might allow the Government to actually be a behind the scenes supporter of National Healthcare because they could afford it. 

However, this would probably require strict Immigration policies so that the U.S. was not over subsidizing healthcare for an unsustainable number of people. Maybe there is a compromise to be had, lower military spending and build a border wall so that Healthcare pricing can be maintained at a more affordable price in the U.S.

As for Mexico paying for the Border Wall, isn't it possible that Mexican Drug Cartel is purposely scaring people into fleeing Mexico as a way to appease the Mexican Government by reducing Healthcare Costs in Mexico?

The Mexican Drug Cartel is so damn rich they could be subsidizing healthcare in Mexico and be loved by the Mexican People, or, they could murder Mexican citizens, causing them to flee in panic to the U.S. and saving the Mexican Government untold billions in Healthcare related costs, and keeping all of their money for themselves. Seems like Mexico and the Mexican Drug Cartel win, Mexican Migrators and the U.S., lose.


If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Add Any